WASHINGTON -- Federal police are reportedly increasing Internet surveillance
after Tuesday's deadly attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
Just hours after three airplanes smashed into the buildings in what some U.S.
legislators have dubbed a second Pearl Harbor, FBI agents began to visit
Web-based, e-mail firms and network providers, according to engineers at those
companies who spoke on condition of anonymity.
An administrator at one major network service provider said that FBI agents
showed up at his workplace on Tuesday "with a couple of Carnivores, requesting
permission to place them in our core, along with offers to actually pay for
circuits and costs."
See
also:Discuss this
story on Plastic.com Images From a Day of
Infamy Experts Blast Airport
Security See More Coverage on
Lycos News Photos
of a Tragedy Everybody's got issues in
Politics Discuss on our Message
Boards:
End
of the World? How
Should Bush Respond?
The person declined to say for publication what the provider's response was,
"but a lot of people" at other firms were quietly going along with the FBI's
request. "I know that they are getting a lot of 'OKs' because they made it a
point to mention that they would only be covering our core for a few days, while
their 'main boxes were being set up at the Tier 1 carriers' -- scary," the
engineer said.
The FBI's controversial Carnivore spy
system, which has been renamed DCS1000, is a specially configured Windows
computer designed to sit on an Internet provider's network and monitor
electronic communications. To retrieve the stored data, an agent stops by to
pick up a removable hard drive with the information that the Carnivore system
was configured to record.
Microsoft's Hotmail service has also
been the target of increased federal attention, according to an engineer who
works there.
"Hotmail officials have been receiving calls from the San Francisco FBI
office since mid-(Tuesday) morning and are cooperating with their expedited
requests for information about a few specific accounts," the person said. "Most
of the account names start with the word 'Allah' and contain messages in
Arabic."
By Tuesday evening, nearly 12 hours after the twin attacks that crippled
Manhattan and left Washington deserted by mid-afternoon, it was unclear who was
responsible. The Washington Post, citing anonymous government
sources, reported that former Saudi businessman Osama bin Laden appears to be
the prime suspect.
In February, U.S. officials claimed
that bin Laden had turned to data-hiding steganography software to conceal
communications with his operatives by means of public websites.
In Washington, use of data-scrambling encryption software is also frequently
mentioned in conjunction with terrorists. "Uncrackable encryption is allowing
terrorists Hamas, Hezbollah, al-Qaida and others to communicate about their
criminal intentions without fear of outside intrusion," then-FBI Director Louis
Freeh told a Senate panel last year. "They're thwarting the efforts of law
enforcement to detect, prevent and investigate illegal activities."
Those comments, and the prospect of congressional reaction to Tuesday's
terrorist attacks, have prompted some civil libertarians to fret about possible
domestic regulation of encryption products.
A few years ago, one House committee approved a bill that would have banned
any encryption product without a back door entrance for the federal government.
By Tuesday afternoon, at least one NBC affiliate had interviewed defense expert
Jim Dunnigan, who
warned that "PGP and Internet encryption" would be blamed for the attacks.
"Those of us who value our liberty, even in the face of danger, will need to
be vigilant in the days to come," says Thomas Leavitt, an online activist who
co-founded Webcom.
Other civil libertarians say it's a mistake to believe that the U.S.
government will overreact to Tuesday's disasters. Marc Rotenberg of the Electronic Privacy Information Center said he
believes that the better approach is to argue that the U.S. must not allow a
terrorist attack on our form of open government to succeed.
It's too early to tell whether he's right or not, but by late Tuesday,
operators of anonymous remailers were already so worried about being conduits
for terrorist communications -- or being blamed for the communications, rightly
or wrongly -- that they pulled the plug.
Operator Len Sassaman said in a post to a remailer-operators list: "I don't
want to get caught in the middle of this. I'm sorry. I'm currently unemployed
and don't have the resources to defend myself. At this point in time, a
free-speech argument will not gain much sympathy with the Feds, judges and
general public."
Remailers forward messages but remove the originating information, so that
the resulting e-mail is anonymized. They customarily don't keep logs, so if the
system works as designed, it should be nearly impossible for anyone to find who
sent the message.
Related Wired Links:

Experts Blast Airport
Security
Sep. 12, 2001
Blame Game Dominates
Chat Rooms
Sep. 11, 2001
Tower Tchotchkes Hot
Souvenir
Sep. 11, 2001
Images From a Day of
Infamy
Sep. 11, 2001
Net Slows in Wake of
Attacks
Sep. 11, 2001
Trapped and Chatting
in NYC
Sep. 11, 2001
Tech Sites Pick up the
News
Sep. 11, 2001
Attack on the United
States
Sep. 11, 2001
Copyright © 1994-2001
Wired Digital Inc. All rights reserved.